On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda wrote about "Re: Cloud Backup": > Google lets you pay for a minimal time of 15 minutes. > ProfitBricks charges by 3 minute chunks.
Thanks, good to know. However, for my purposes, 60 cents (one hour a day) vs 15 cents (15 minutes a day) are not big differentiator. > You are neglecting the most important cost: of data transfer. See "To Cloud > Or Not To Cloud? Musings On Costs and Viability." This would definitely *not* be the most important cost for me. I'm doing incremental backup never deleting anything (rsync --backup with a new --backup-dir every time) on rsync.net for 3 years, and so far my total is 15 GB. This means that over 3 years I sent to them roughly 15 GB, and requested a tiny fraction of that. In Amazon, transer into EC2 is actually free, but even if it weren't, at their most expensive rate of 12 cents per gigabyte, transferring those 15 gigabytes would cost me 0.12*15 = $1.80 for the 3 years doesn't sound much compared to the $0.09*15 = $1.60 I'll pay every month for storing the data. Restoring the *whole* thing will also cost me $1.80 - again not much of considering the use case (if I lose all my data, $1.8 is negligable) and not much compared to the usual monthly cost. The situation would be different, of course, for people who generate gigabytes of new data every month. I'm not one of these people. Thanks, Nadav. -- Nadav Har'El | Saturday, Feb 23 2013, 14 Adar 5773 n...@math.technion.ac.il |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |Evening news begins with 'Good evening', http://nadav.harel.org.il |and then proceeds to say why it isn't. _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
