On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Imri Zvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot discuss this further when you refuse to give ANY factual data. You > publicy trash people (the abuse@ and all the other people behind that ISP) > with quite a harsh words, and refuse to back it up with facts. > So don't. I didn't mean you to. It was a rant. It was a single sided exclamation of my thoughts about the topic. If I wanted your response, I could have asked for it. > You, yet again, dismiss my attempts to help you, saying it's won't help > (???). It seems you don't really want to be helped, but just taking > advantage of the free and cheap shot. > Precisely. This is exactly what I did. I used this stage to rant. Finally, you got it. I must emphasize this - almost 24 hours after the original flametory post, I > still didn't get ANYTHING to work with. > Nor will you, unless you happen to belong to the ISP I was talking about and have access to the abuse mailbox. Actually, I bet the messages to the abuse mailbox are archived somewhere. My name is pretty unique. Since my sophisticated loop detection algorithms detected a loop in this conversation, I will stop responding unless I observe something new. -- Arik
