On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:17:25PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why not?
> 
> You are talking about debian Testing, which as far as I know goes through
> a little more filtering, and if nothing has changed then there is no 
> point in
> re-building Packages.gz
> 
> Also, as far as I can tell, the date you quote actually reflects the date at
> the original site (so the mirror software knows the local copy is up to 
> date).
> 


  It got updated while we were exchanging messages. Now hamakor mirror
has a time stamp of 04-Sep-2003 too, and indeed console-data, for
example, shows the up to date version. 
  There was still a lag of 2 or 3 days between the time that the local
mirror had the up to date console-data pointed to in its Packages.gz and
the time that the upstream mirror had it. Perhaps the little filter is
buggy? There was a similar problem a week or so ago. It was fixed then
just as it was fixed now: by updating Packages.gz. Yet then Schahar told
me about a `Disk Full' situation. Does hamakor suffer from such a
problem? 
  By the way, how come the time stamp of the file is 04-Sep-2003 22:19?
-- 

    Shaul Karl,    shaulk @ actcom . net . il

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to