"Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OG>> Is this an allusion to lisp? It is compiled now. Actually, I am
>
> As I see, most interpreted languages become more or less "compiled"
> as they develop...
Most non-interpreted languages are now dead, aren't they? ;-)
Well, with Lisp you have a choice. You can have it interpreted (very
useful for development, prorotyping, and lots of other things) or
compiled (for performance). And it's not "more or less compiled" -
truly compiled (various implementations of Common Lisp). Some
dialects, such as elisp or xlispstat, are byte-compiled only though,
but I never found that a limitation, and I use both extensively.
My religion is better than yours, anyway [SMILEY!!!], and I am not
sure everybody thinks that lisp is on-topic here, so let's cut the
thread - I apologize for picking it up.
--
Oleg Goldshmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
