On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 09:44:37PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > From: Bobby Eshleman <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Add netns support to loopback and vhost. Keep netns disabled for
> > virtio-vsock, but add necessary changes to comply with common API
> > updates.
> > 
> > This is the patch in the series when vhost-vsock namespaces actually
> > come online.  Hence, vhost_transport_supports_local_mode() is switched
> > to return true.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes in v11:
> > - reorder with the skb ownership patch for loopback (Stefano)
> > - toggle vhost_transport_supports_local_mode() to true
> > 
> > Changes in v10:
> > - Splitting patches complicates the series with meaningless placeholder
> >  values that eventually get replaced anyway, so to avoid that this
> >  patch combines into one. Links to previous patches here:
> >  - Link: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> >  - Link: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> >  - Link: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > - remove placeholder values (Stefano)
> > - update comment describe net/net_mode for
> >  virtio_transport_reset_no_sock()
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/vsock.c                   | 47 ++++++++++++++++++------
> > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h            |  8 +++--
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c        | 10 ++++--
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 63 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c          |  8 +++--
> > 5 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>

If we move the supports_local_mode() changes into this patch (for virtio
and loopback, as I bring up in other discussion), should I drop this
trailer or carry it forward?

Thanks,
Bobby

Reply via email to