On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:49:35 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 26 Feb 13:47, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >-struct mlx5e_umr_wqe {
> >+struct mlx5e_umr_wqe_hdr {
> > struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl;
> > struct mlx5_wqe_umr_ctrl_seg uctrl;
> > struct mlx5_mkey_seg mkc;
> >+};
> >+
> >+struct mlx5e_umr_wqe {
> >+ struct mlx5e_umr_wqe_hdr hdr;
>
> You missed or ignored my comment on v0, anyway:
>
> Can we have struct mlx5e_umr_wq_hdr defined anonymously within
> mlx5e_umr_wqe? Let's avoid namespace pollution.
It's also used in struct mlx5e_rq, I don't think it can be anonymous?
