Hi No , sorry, I have no more this configuration right now, but there were many msg at the end of 2010 with regard to my configuration and my problems. but anyway, my request in this thread was : did somebody succeed to have a robust HA configuration on RHEL with the stack Pacemaker/corosync and using OCFS2 FS primitives with the ocfs2.pcmk ... that's all I would like to know , I don't want to waste
time to configure a new test configuration if nobody has succeeded with this configuration. Regards. Alain De : emmanuel segura <[email protected]> A : General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> Date : 02/02/2012 16:46 Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Status about ocfs2.pcmk ? Envoyé par : [email protected] Sorry But can we see your configuration? 2012/2/2 <[email protected]> > Hi > Don't remember in details, it was at the end of 2010 ... but : > Why pacemaker is fencing a node ? > because it was one of my simple HA test : for example, make the heartbeat > no more working so > that pacemaker fences the node, and it did it for sure, but on the > remaining node, sometimes ocfs2 crashes > the node, or the FS ocfs2 was passing in read-only ... > I did simple HA tests, such as this one above, to check the robustness of > the configuration and many times, > it failed and make the HA cluster down. > That's why I ask for status today. > > Alain > > > > De : "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> > A : "General Linux-HA mailing list" <[email protected]> > Date : 02/02/2012 16:01 > Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Status about ocfs2.pcmk ? > Envoyé par : [email protected] > > > > >>> <[email protected]> schrieb am 02.02.2012 um 16:05 in Nachricht > <of5716529b.0ca482e6-onc1257998.0050e240-c1257998.00518...@bull.net>: > > Hi > > Thanks. > > OK but I also could mount the FS , the problems in 2010 on RHEL was that > > > the configuration was not robust , meaning that during validation tests, > > > there were often cases where both nodes were dead : one fenced by > > Pacemaker and the other killed itself by ocfs2, or problems on mount > > read-only FS after failover , etc. > > Hi! > > I'd start inspecting the logs: Why is pacemaker fencing a node? Why is the > filesytem read-only? > > Regards, > Ulrich > > > > Alain > > > > > > > > De : "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> > > A : <[email protected]> > > Date : 02/02/2012 15:33 > > Objet : [Linux-HA] Antw: Status about ocfs2.pcmk ? > > Envoyé par : [email protected] > > > > > > > > Hi! > > I have something running using OCFS on SLES11 SP1: > > > > ocf:pacemaker:controld > > ocf:ocfs2:o2cb > > > > At least I could mount the filesystem with it: > > /dev/drbd_r0 on /exports/ocfs/samba type ocfs2 > > (rw,_netdev,acl,cluster_stack=pcmk) > > > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > >>>> <[email protected]> schrieb am 02.02.2012 um 14:54 in Nachricht > > <offed8db74.9970c9e4-onc1257998.004a64db-c1257998.004b1...@bull.net>: > > > Hi > > > > > > Just wonder if someone has succeded to configured a working HA > > > configuration with Pacemaker/corosync > > > and OCFS2 file systems, meaning using ocfs2.pcmk , on RHEL6 mainly > (and > > > eventually SLES11) ? > > > > > > (I tried at the end of 2010 but gave up after a few weeks because it > was > > > > > not working at all) > > > > > > Thanks if someone can give a status? > > > Regards > > > Alain Moullé > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > -- esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
