>>> <[email protected]> schrieb am 02.02.2012 um 16:05 in Nachricht <of5716529b.0ca482e6-onc1257998.0050e240-c1257998.00518...@bull.net>: > Hi > Thanks. > OK but I also could mount the FS , the problems in 2010 on RHEL was that > the configuration was not robust , meaning that during validation tests, > there were often cases where both nodes were dead : one fenced by > Pacemaker and the other killed itself by ocfs2, or problems on mount > read-only FS after failover , etc.
Hi! I'd start inspecting the logs: Why is pacemaker fencing a node? Why is the filesytem read-only? Regards, Ulrich > Alain > > > > De : "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> > A : <[email protected]> > Date : 02/02/2012 15:33 > Objet : [Linux-HA] Antw: Status about ocfs2.pcmk ? > Envoyé par : [email protected] > > > > Hi! > I have something running using OCFS on SLES11 SP1: > > ocf:pacemaker:controld > ocf:ocfs2:o2cb > > At least I could mount the filesystem with it: > /dev/drbd_r0 on /exports/ocfs/samba type ocfs2 > (rw,_netdev,acl,cluster_stack=pcmk) > > Regards, > Ulrich > >>>> <[email protected]> schrieb am 02.02.2012 um 14:54 in Nachricht > <offed8db74.9970c9e4-onc1257998.004a64db-c1257998.004b1...@bull.net>: > > Hi > > > > Just wonder if someone has succeded to configured a working HA > > configuration with Pacemaker/corosync > > and OCFS2 file systems, meaning using ocfs2.pcmk , on RHEL6 mainly (and > > eventually SLES11) ? > > > > (I tried at the end of 2010 but gave up after a few weeks because it was > > > not working at all) > > > > Thanks if someone can give a status? > > Regards > > Alain Moullé > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
