On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 11:11 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > If you're using resource-agents, the package should be named > ldirectord not heartbeat-ldirectord. The two packages should also > have the same release numbers, probably something like 1.0.3-x.
I figured as much. But there appears to be a problem with the ldirectord package from clusterlabs, as explained in an earlier message from Masashi Yamaguchi <[email protected]>: > think "ldirectord" rpm package's spec for RedHat/CentOS is > inconsistent. > > $ rpm -qp --provides ldirectord-1.0.3-2.el5.x86_64.rpm > config(ldirectord) =3D 1.0.3-2.el5 > heartbeat-ldirectord > ldirectord =3D 1.0.3-2.el5 > $ rpm -qp --conflicts ldirectord-1.0.3-2.el5.x86_64.rpm > heartbeat-ldirectord > $ > > "ldirectord" package PROVIDES "heartbeat-ldirectord" and > CONFLICTS with "heartbeat-ldirectord". > "ldirectord" package' spec has self-conflict. > > This is a patch for the problem. > --- resource-agents.spec > +++ resource-agents.spec > @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ > Requires: %{SSLeay} perl-libwww-perl ipvsadm > Provides: heartbeat-ldirectord > Obsoletes: heartbeat-ldirectord > -Conflicts: heartbeat-ldirectord > Requires: perl-MailTools > %if 0%{?suse_version} > Requires: logrotate > > I installed the modified ldirectord package successfully. > --Greg _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
