> Well, not my call :) At any rate, test thoroughly your cluster. What? You won't take responsibility for this? :-)
Here's one question about Pacemaker. With my heartbeat R1 clusters, I have a large number of resources (multiple instances of MySQL), most of which are not dependent on each other. But since the resource scripts are run sequentially, it takes a long time (about 3 minutes) to fail over. With Pacemaker, will the non-dependent resources be managed concurrently by separate threads, enabling failover to happen faster? -- Eric Robinson Disclaimer - February 11, 2010 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for General Linux-HA mailing list. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
