On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Kevin Harms <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew, > > thanks for this information. Is there any way to influence the > "weight" of the resource rather than just by pure number?
Not yet. We have a rough idea of how we want to implement this, but not the time to do so. > Some > resources are more intensive than others. I don't think increasing the > score for the backup will work in a N+1 type backup scheme. As nodes > fail I don't want all the resources to keep going to the backup. I'd > like them to be spread evenly across the available nodes. It seems > like this scenario will work correctly if I could give the different > resources some type of weighting factor. > > thanks, > kevin > > On May 8, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Kevin Harms <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> In the following documentation: >>> http://clusterlabs.org/mediawiki/images/7/7d/Configuration_Explained_0.6.pdf >>> there is a sub-heading titled "What if Two Nodes Have the Same >>> Score" that contains the statement "It would likely have placed >>> Webserver based on the node’s uname and Database based on the desire >>> to spread the resource load evenly across the cluster." >>> >>> I would like to know how the "desire to spread the resource load >>> evenly" is determined? >> >> If two nodes have the same score, the one with the least number of >> resources on it gets the next one. >> If both have the same amount, its effectively random. >> >>> I'm trying to setup my cluster so resource will >>> end up on my "backup" node when a primary node fails. >> >> Give it a lower score (with a rsc_location constraint) than the >> primary and a higher score than the other nodes in the cluster. >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
