On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:25:02PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> >> @@ -637,10 +637,11 @@ int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> >> *
> >> * For a 35MB LLC and 56 RMIDs, this is ~1.8% of the LLC.
> >> */
> >> - intel_cqm_threshold = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024 / r->num_rmid;
> >> + resctrl_cqm_threshold = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024 /
> >> + r->num_rmid;
> >
> > No need to break that line here.
>
> Without the line break, checkpatch complains for "line over 80
> characters". Do you think we can ignore those?
To quote from the tip handbook which is in preparation right now:
"+The 80 character rule is not a strict rule, so please use common sense when
+breaking lines."
In this particular case, it is more readable IMO to leave the line unbroken:
resctrl_cqm_threshold = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024 /
r->num_rmid;
What is even more readable though is:
unsigned int cl_size = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size;
...
resctrl_cqm_threshold = cl_size * 1024 / r->num_rmid;
and now you have a win-win situation. :)
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
