Boris, On 11/12/18 11:56 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:27PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote: >> As AMD is starting to support RDT(or QOS) features, rename >> the RDT functions and definitions to more generic names. >> >> Replace intel_rdt to resctrl where applicable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.mo...@amd.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl_sched.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------ >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h | 2 +- >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_monitor.c | 11 ++++++----- >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_rdtgroup.c | 10 +++++----- >> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 +- >> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +- >> 7 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > As with patch 1, pls fix subject prefix. > Ok. Sure.
>> @@ -637,10 +637,11 @@ int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r) >> * >> * For a 35MB LLC and 56 RMIDs, this is ~1.8% of the LLC. >> */ >> - intel_cqm_threshold = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024 / r->num_rmid; >> + resctrl_cqm_threshold = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024 / >> + r->num_rmid; > > No need to break that line here. Without the line break, checkpatch complains for "line over 80 characters". Do you think we can ignore those? > > With that addressed and FWIW: > > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> >
