On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:33:30PM +0800, Zhangshaokun wrote:
> On 2017/10/17 23:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:07:54PM +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
> >> +static int hisi_l3c_pmu_init_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >> +                            struct hisi_pmu *l3c_pmu)
> >> +{
> >> +  unsigned long long id;
> >> +  struct resource *res;
> >> +  acpi_status status;
> >> +  int cpu;
> >> +
> >> +  status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev),
> >> +                                 "_UID", NULL, &id);
> >> +  if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> >> +          return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +  l3c_pmu->id = id;
> >> +
> >> +  /*
> >> +   * Use the SCCL_ID and CCL_ID to identify the L3C PMU, while
> >> +   * SCCL_ID is in MPIDR[aff2] and CCL_ID is in MPIDR[aff1].
> >> +   */
> >> +  if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "hisilicon,scl-id",
> >> +                               &l3c_pmu->sccl_id)) {
> >> +          dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not read l3c sccl-id!\n");
> >> +          return -EINVAL;
> >> +  }
> >> +
> >> +  if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "hisilicon,ccl-id",
> >> +                               &l3c_pmu->ccl_id)) {
> >> +          dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not read l3c ccl-id!\n");
> >> +          return -EINVAL;
> >> +  }
> >> +
> >> +  /* Initialise the associated cpumask of the PMU */
> >> +  for_each_present_cpu(cpu)
> >> +          smp_call_function_single(cpu, hisi_l3c_pmu_set_cpumask_by_ccl,
> >> +                                   (void *)l3c_pmu, 1);

> > Rather than a proble-time smp_call_function_single(), can you follow the
> > qcom l2's approach of associating CPUs with a PMU instance in the
> > notifier? That will work even if CPUs are brought online very late.
> 
> A good guidance, but HHA and DDRC PMUs are different from L3C PMU, the former
> share the same SCCL and the latter share the same SCCL and CCL. I will
> try to deal with this difference in online notifier.

FWIW, I think it makes sense for each PMU to have its own notifier
(perhaps with some shared code that each calls to do the migration).

I just want to avoid the smp_call_function_single() at probe time, as
that doesn't work in some cases.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to