On 2019/10/22 下午3:33, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 21/10/2019 17:22, David Sterba wrote:
>> --force was added for a different reason, to allow check on a mounted
>> filesystem. I don't think that combining --repair and --force just to
>> allow repair is a good idea. There's a 'dangerous repair' mode for eg.
>> xfs that allows to do live surgery on a mounted filesytem (followed by
>> immediate reboot). We want to be able to do that eventually.
>>
>> I understand where the motivation comes from, let me have a second
>> thought on that.
>
> So how about adding a '--yes' or '--accept', '--dangerous',
> '--allow-dangeruos' parameter instead of force to skip the warning?
>
> My vote would go for '--allow-dangerous'.
+1 for '--yes', at least e2fsck has a similar '-y' option.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> Byte,
> Johannes
>
