On 21/10/2019 17:22, David Sterba wrote:
> --force was added for a different reason, to allow check on a mounted
> filesystem. I don't think that combining --repair and --force just to
> allow repair is a good idea. There's a 'dangerous repair' mode for eg.
> xfs that allows to do live surgery on a mounted filesytem (followed by
> immediate reboot). We want to be able to do that eventually.
>
> I understand where the motivation comes from, let me have a second
> thought on that.
So how about adding a '--yes' or '--accept', '--dangerous',
'--allow-dangeruos' parameter instead of force to skip the warning?
My vote would go for '--allow-dangerous'.
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems
[email protected] +49 911 74053 689
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
