On 05/15/2013 05:02 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:41 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 15 May 2013 14:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote:
I see that the ARM version is following the pattern of SPARC64 and X86
SSSE3 in how it is configured, so for fear of opening a can of worms,
perhaps it's simpler if we just go with the linaro-base.conf patch which
started this thread? :-)
Yes please!
I've just spotted that you have posted a fix to the ARM SHA1 code [1] so
perhaps we shouldn't enable it until that fix works its way into the
Linaro tree? (If it's important for Linaro work the perhaps you could
ask Andrey to add the patch to the Linaro tree early.)
- added the "ARM: crypto: sha1-armv4-large.S: fix SP handling" patch to
linux-linaro-core-tracking tree starting from tag llct-20130515.1
Thanks,
Andrey
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/168374.html
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
