On Wed, 15 May 2013, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 May 2013 14:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: > > I see that the ARM version is following the pattern of SPARC64 and X86 > > SSSE3 in how it is configured, so for fear of opening a can of worms, > > perhaps it's simpler if we just go with the linaro-base.conf patch which > > started this thread? :-) > > > > Yes please!
Please make sure your sp adjustment patch is included or you'll get corrupted SHA1 digest whenever an interrupt is serviced in the middle of the SHA1 processing ( ... unless you have CONFIG_KPROBES=y in which case you would have been lucky to get headroom on the stack). Nicolas _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
