On 9 April 2013 22:13, David Zinman <david.zin...@linaro.org> wrote: > Yes, fairly typical as you can see by the historical numbers. One of the > reasons for highlighting this is so that there is incentive to improve. As > we move forward with refining our processes, better planning will be a > primary focus. > > > On 9 April 2013 14:41, Mark Orvek <mark.or...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> David, >> >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:35 AM, David Zinman <david.zin...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Postmortem and lessons learned for Linaro's release 2013.03 >>> >>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1303/Release/Review >>> >>> Highlights and Key Successes >>> ============================ >>> http://www.linaro.org/downloads/1303 >>> >>> http://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1303/Release#Release_Information >>> >>> >>> Blueprints >>> ========= >>> The number of high or essential priority blueprints that missed the >>> cycle: >>> Android 4 out of 12 >>> Developer Platform 4 out of 5 >>> Infrastructure 1 out of 5 >>> Lava 4 out of 7 >>> Total 13 out of 29 >>> >>> 45% of high or essential priority blueprints scheduled for this cycle >>> were not delivered. >> >> >> This seems high "failure" rate. Is it typical?
It isn't failures. It's a statistic providing the number of blueprints bumped to the next cycle. In several cases, it doesn't reflect the quality of the planning or even the "missed" blueprints for the cycle. In other words, these numbers should be taken with a grain of salt. By the way, only Platform provides such data... >> Mark >> >>> >>> >>> Total blueprints: 22 out of 45 missed the cycle. >>> * Not included is data from the QA team >>> >>> High priority missed blueprints recap: >>> 12.05: 19 out of 48, 39% >>> 12.06: 13 out of 31, 42% >>> 12.07: 14 out of 31, 45% >>> 12.08: 6 out of 26, 23% >>> 12.09: 9 out of 28, 32% >>> 12.10: 15 out of 38, 39% >>> 12.11: 7 out of 19, 37% >>> 12.12: not available >>> 13.01: 9 out of 28, 33% >>> 13.02: 35 out of 69, 48% >>> >>> * Not included is data from working groups and landing teams >>> >>> Source: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjEaTwrvj1bidExFWUpKTm1iOURjdkdrdjJsX0JBbWc&usp=sharing >>> >>> -- >>> David Zinman, Project Manager >>> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mark Orvek >> >> mark.or...@linaro.org >> >> VP, Engineering >> >> M: +1.408.313.6988 IRC: morvek Skype: morvek >> linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs >> >> > > > > -- > David Zinman, Project Manager > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs -- Fathi Boudra Release Manager | Builds and Baselines Engineering Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
