On 30 October 2012 14:30, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote: > It is very curious if we disable all the configs option, a slave > creation raise a BUG (cf. dsa_slave_create). IIUC, booting with NET_DSA > enabled and none of the NET_DSA_TAG* enabled will raise a BUG in the > probe function, right ? > > Maybe we should force at least one config when none are set ?
I thought of it earlier. But found the one which i posted better. As we will not compile DSA stuff now without these tags. -- viresh > diff --git a/net/dsa/Kconfig b/net/dsa/Kconfig > index 274791c..86326e3 100644 > --- a/net/dsa/Kconfig > +++ b/net/dsa/Kconfig > @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@ > -config NET_DSA > +menuconfig NET_DSA > tristate "Distributed Switch Architecture support" > default n > depends on EXPERIMENTAL && NETDEVICES && !S390 > select PHYLIB > + select NET_DSA_TAG_DSA if (!NET_DSA_TAG_EDSA && > !NET_DSA_TAG_TRAILER) > ---help--- > This allows you to use hardware switch chips that use > the Distributed Switch Architecture. > @@ -12,15 +13,15 @@ if NET_DSA > > # tagging formats > config NET_DSA_TAG_DSA > - bool > + bool "tag dsa" > default n > > config NET_DSA_TAG_EDSA > - bool > + bool "tag edsa" > default n > > config NET_DSA_TAG_TRAILER > - bool > + bool "tag trailer" > default n > > endif > > > -- > <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs > > Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | > <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | > <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
