On 25 October 2012 18:11, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 25 October 2012 15:34, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 25 October 2012 15:26, Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> This is what your prcmu driver's routines are doing:
>
> int db8500_prcmu_config_hotmon(u8 low, u8 high)
> {
> ...
> wait_for_completion(&mb4_transfer.work);
> ...
> return 0;
> }
>
> This is why others in STE have used threaded_irqs... Because the
> routine you guys call from interrupt handlers actually sleeps.
>
I should find this for you, but you find it for me :(
Thanks a lot.
> So, they can't be called from interrupt context.
>
> I wanted you to knew this :)
>
> Its okay now, you need to use threaded irq only and you can't use
> normal request_irq(). Its not that you want to make things fast that's why
> you used threaded irqs... If you try to sleep from interrupt context
> (i.e. if you
> have registered your handler with request_irq()), you will see a kernel crash.
>
> --
> viresh
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
