On 25 October 2012 17:42, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 25 October 2012 15:03, Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 25 October 2012 16:41, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Just paste my current pieces of codes here:
>>
>> static struct db8500_thsens_platform_data*
>> db8500_thermal_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>
>> if (!np) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing device tree data\n");
>
>> }
>>
>> static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>
>> ptrips = db8500_thermal_parse_dt(pdev);
>> if (!ptrips)
>> ptrips = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> So, the above code still has the flaw i pointed out. It will print
> "Missing device tree data", while booting for non-DT case.
>
> What i would suggest you is:
>
> static int db8500_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>
> if (np)
> ptrips = db8500_thermal_parse_dt(pdev);
> else
> ptrips = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> if (!ptrips)
> explode!!
>
This seems neat.
>
>>>>>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, low_irq, NULL,
>
>> I just saw that all the PRCMU and ab8500 related irqs use
>> request_threaded_irq
>> only difference is that I use devm_request_threaded_irq
>
> See, i started this threaded_irq thread is to make sure you know
> exactly what you
> are doing. Others are doing it doesn't mean you should do it too.. :)
>
> You must dig in a bit to see why is it required for your case? If
> earlier code related
> to PRCMU and db8500 is correct, then i am sure you need to sleep from your
> handler.
>
> --
> viresh
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
