On 15 May 2012 04:33, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Tushar, > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Tushar Behera <tushar.beh...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> On 14 May 2012 13:40, Tushar Behera <tushar.beh...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 05/12/2012 11:09 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>>> Tushar, >>>> >>>> On 05/11/2012 09:04 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: >>>>> On 05/11/2012 01:04 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>> >>>>>> So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro tree since the 12.04 release. >>>>>> (The generic topic updates were being done to the >>>>>> linux-linaro-core-tracking tree) >>>>>> >>>>>> Now it is time to move the focus to the linux-linaro tree. For one week >>>>>> it will use the mainline tip as the base. Then, on next Thursday the >>>>>> most recent -rc will be selected as the base, and won't be changed until >>>>>> 12.05 is released. Most probably it will be v3.4-rc7. >>>>>> >>>>>> The 12.05 linux-linaro tree will get the ARM and Samsung LTs topics plus >>>>>> the 7 generic topics currently included into the >>>>>> linux-linaro-core-tracking tree: >>>>>> ufs (ufs-for-linux-linaro) >>>>>> emmc (emmc-for-linux-linaro) >>>>>> thermal_exynos4_imx6 (thermal_exynos4_imx6_work) >>>>>> linaro-android-3.4 >>>>>> armlt-gator (tracking-armlt-gator) >>>>>> umm-wip (umm-3.4rc4-wip) >>>>>> linaro-configs-3.4 >>>>>> If you don't see your generic topic in this list, but you think it >>>>>> should be there, please let me know ASAP. If you have a new topic to >>>>>> add, please send me the request before the next Thursday, May 17; the >>>>>> sooner, the better. The requirements for a topic can be found here: >>>>>> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelTreeProcess#Adding_a_topic_to_linux-linaro_kernel_and_maintaining_it >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The landing teams - please update your topic branches if needed: >>>>>> ARM: >>>>>> tracking-armlt-hdlcd tracking-armlt-mmc >>>>>> tracking-armlt-arm-arch-fixes tracking-armlt-misc-fixes >>>>>> tracking-armlt-ubuntu-config tracking-armlt-android-config >>>>>> Samsung: >>>>>> topic/base topic/core topic/bl topic/dt topic/fb topic/pd >>>>>> topic/s2ram topic/asv_cpufreq topic/led topic/dummy_reg >>>>>> topic/gadget topic/touch topic/wlan topic/audio topic/hdmi >>>>>> topic/mali topic/cma_v24 topic/android_config >>>>>> >>>>> Is any other LT using CMA patchset? If so, this topic branch can be >>>>> moved into linux-linaro-core-tracking. >>>> >>>> That's a good idea, thanks! >>>> >>>> The only problem is that your topic/cma_v24 is based on the topic/base, >>>> and thus includes "CONFIG: ORIGEN:" commits and an older version of >>>> linaro-configs-3.4 topic. In particular, the latter recreates >>>> configs/panda.conf file which has been deleted from the current >>>> linaro-configs-3.4. Could you please make topic/cma_v24 mainline based >>>> (drop these "CONFIG: ORIGEN:" and configs/* changes)? And is the >>>> "CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES=32" option Origen specific or generic? If it is >>>> generic, it should go into a separate file, e.g. configs/cma.conf. >>>> >>> I didn't mean to include topic/cma_v24 with the patches from topic/base, >>> rather the clean patchset from Marek. But now that we have the umm topic >>> branch in linux-linaro-core-tracking, we don't need topic/cma_v24 >>> anymore. If any fixes with respect to Origen are required, I will queue >>> them up in another topic branch. >>> >>> I will shortly send you the list of topic branches for 2012.05 release, >>> now that 3.4-rc7 is already released. >>> >> >> While migrating the Android solution to use linux-linaro-core-tracking, I >> get kernel panic with umm-patchset (haven't dug deep into it though, it >> might be because the multimedia drivers are not yet migrated for using UMM). >> Would it be ok if we only include CMA patchset, but not the dma-buf and >> dma-mapping patches? >> > > are you asking whether we would consider to drop dma-mapping from > linux-linaro tree or if it would be a bad idea to do that in your > samsung LT tree? >
Actually we were planning to base 2012.05 release on linux-linaro kernel, that is why I was looking at options. We will rather have 2012.05 release based Samsung LT tree till this issue has been fixed. > For linux-linaro, we probably would prefer to try to fix it before > talking about the option to drop such a core topic. Do you have more > info about the kernel panic you see? > > -- > Alexander Sack > Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams > http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog -- Tushar Behera _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
