On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:27:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:18:21PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:44:39PM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > > > >> I don't think we need a cpu_is_imx6q(), but having some i.MX6 specific > > > >> hook at device_initcall time can't be too wrong. Shawn? > > > >> > > > > Yep, it works for me. > > > > > > > Sascha, Shawn, thanks for the response. > > > > > > Since device_initcall isn't platform specific, it seems I would still > > > need a cpu_is_imx6q() function or similiar functionality from a device > > > tree call. Or do you have something else in mind that I'm not seeing? > > > > > I guess Sascha is asking for something like the following. > > > > static int __init imx_device_init(void) > > { > > imx5_device_init(); > > imx6_device_init(); > > } > > device_initcall(imx_device_init) > > > > static int __init imx6_device_init(void) > > { > > /* > > * do whatever needs to get done in device_initcall time > > */ > > } > > The problem is more how we can detect that we are actually running a > i.MX6 SoC. We could directly ask the devicetree in an initcall or we > could introduce a cpu_is_mx6() just like we have a macro for all other > i.MX SoCs. > Oops, my reply was a brain-dead one. Hmm, then it seems that we have to introduce cpu_is_mx6() which I tried hard to avoid. I do not have a preference between defining a macro and asking device tree.
-- Regards, Shawn _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev