On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:02:19PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 10:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:22:00PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > 
> > > The linux-arm-kernel[1] project on patches.l.o was using the following 
> > > source
> > > tree 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm.git
> > > 
> > > to track committed patches, but fetching that repo seems to have become
> > > ridiculously slow, causing git to take ages to update the local copy or 
> > > get a
> > > new one.  So I'm wondering if there's any mirror of that repo (served via
> > > HTTP as we can't fetch git:// URLs from the machine that runs patches.l.o)
> > > somewhere with a bigger pipe?  If not, would it be ok to change the source
> > > tree of linux-arm-kernel to Linus' tree?
> > 
> > Most people seem to be experiencing problems with this tree just now.
> > 
> > The correct result is that the check for merges in rmk's tree should return
> > no result in this case -- we simply don't know what is merged in there.
> > Can you time it out (or just temporarily turn off fetching of that tree)?
> 
> I've turned it off for now as I couldn't find a way to specify a timeout for
> git.
> 
> > 
> > Fetching torvalds/master twice doesn't really give us any more useful
> > information than fetching it once.
> 
> We only look for the patches sent to the linux-arm-kernel list on RMK's tree;
> what I was proposing was to look for them on torvalds/master instead (for the
> time being), but if torvalds can't merge from that tree either, it won't buy
> us anything.

I see what you mean -- yes, checking torvalds/master is probably the
right thing.

It's not always guaranteed that patches posted via linux-arm-kernel will
merge in Russell's tree first in any case (though a lot will).


I did manage to fetch his tree yesterday, but it was very slow.

Cheers
---Dave

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to