W dniu 08.12.2011 05:16, Andy Green pisze:
On 12/08/2011 10:56 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Zygmunt Krynicki
<zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote:
W dniu 08.12.2011 02:54, Ricardo Salveti pisze:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki
<zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org> wrote:
I don't want to push 100% over usb but pushing 99.9 (all except to
boot
loader) works for all boards as far as I know. This would give us
controllable master image (hell we could install tests before
turning the
power on).

I guess this will only be an issue with Origen, as to make ethernet to
work at the boot loader you also need to have USB support (kind of
similar as Panda). For the others I believe it should just work (if
not, it's a bug).

What is a bug, bootloader not supporting Ethernet?

Well all the other boot loaders seem to ;-)


Getting it to work with panda would be a major milestone. I don't treat
boards as equal as they are not equal. Last time I checked uboot has
lots of
USB and ethernet support so we might be able to eventually do it
assuming
actual bugs in both linux kernel and uboot for origen are fixed.

For Panda at least you should have everything you need:
1 - USB booting for SPL/U-Boot with USB SPL support;
2 - Ethernet support at U-Boot with TFTP and PXE support;
3 - Unique mac address at both u-boot and kernel (same one, same code
to calculate it);

Once you make it work with Panda, we can later then try to have the
same support at the other boards we have.

Do all the supported SoC ROMs support USB booting, or workable alternative?

The alternative is to keep a static copy of uboot on the SD card as we've been doing all the time now.

ZK

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to