On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:57:53PM +0530, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote:
[...] > > Example: > > > > http://ci.linaro.org/kernel_hwpack/linux-next_beagle-omap2plus<https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/Linux%20Next%20CI%20Builds/job/linux-next_beagle-omap2plus/> > > /hwpack_linaro-panda_20110927-0545.b160.tar.gz > > > > would refer to the hwpack coming out of this build: > > > > -> > > https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/Linux%20Next%20CI%20Builds/job/linux-next_beagle-omap2plus/160/ > > > > Sounds good? > > > > Yeah! This sounds good. > I have submitted the changes to include the git tree being built and the job > name as below : > > http://ci.linaro.org/kernel_hwpack/linux-linaro-3_0/linux-linaro-3.0_panda-omap2plus/hwpack_linaro-panda_20111011-1313_armel_supported.tar.gz > > Let me know if we need more changes. Can we please include the build number as Alexander suggested? Also, what timezone is used to determine the date and time? I think we should use UTC, not any local timezone. Otherwise, it looks good to me. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
