Hello Alexander, Oops! I am sorry if I have misunderstood the BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-ci/+spec/improve-hwpack-names. If we check the Acceptance criteria, it says
"Acceptance: The new name of hwpack generated by the linaro-hwpack-replace contains the defconfig information." If we need to change the path of where the hwpack are stored and not the hwpack names then we need not have to change anything in the linaro-hwpack-replace. In that case we would need to rewrite the BP with appropriate items. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@linaro.org>wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: >> > 1) The board on which the hwpack can be booted >> > 2) The hwpack creation timestamp includes the date in yyyymmdd format >> along >> > with the time in hhmm format. >> > >> > The hwpack name does not include any defconfig related information, >> which >> > was used to build the kernel. >> > Do we need to use the defconfig name as well to be part of the hwpack >> name ? >> > Is there any other information you would like to include in the hwpack >> name >> > ? >> > Or do we need to continue with the current hwpack names ? >> >> We rarely use a defconfig alone; however in the case of kernel .debs, >> you should find the corresponding config under boot/config-`uname -r` >> in the .deb (dpkg-deb -x the kernel .deb to find the config). >> >> > (note that in the case of kernel CI we currently use pure defconfig > configurations) > > What I asked deepti to work on is to make the CI hwpacks exported > through http://ci.linaro.org/kernel_hwpack/ to be better backtrack-able > to the actual CI job they are coming from. > > Instead of exploding the hwpack name with more info, we could also > introduce a new directory level in the kernel_hwpack directory like: > > kernel_hwpack/ci_job_name/HWPACK1,2,3 > > ... and then leave the hwpack names as they are now. Maybe > improve the version to rather use the git describe version of > the kernel tree and not the kind of meaningless timestamp. > > -- > Alexander Sack > Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams > http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog > > > -- Thanks and Regards, Deepti Infrastructure Team Member, Linaro Platform Teams Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
