On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:12:22PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > stage-origen-11.09-release > stage-panda-11.09-release > stage-snowball-11.09-release > stage-imx53-11.09-release > panda-11.09-release > beagle-11.09-release > > Would be: > > origen-staging-11.09-taupe > panda-staging-11.09-mauve > snowball-staging-11-burntsienna > imx53-staging-11.09-orangecrush > panda-11.09-crucialpink > beagle-11.09-black
The main problem I see with staging is that it's simply not true in the common sense of the word staging -- it implies that what is in staging today is intended to become upstream (or "mainstream") in the future, whereas there's lots that is in the LT branches which, well, isn't. OTOH, I really can't come up with good alternatives to 'staging' that I don't see other problems with. There was a "non-upstreamable" suggestion a while back, and I have been known to call them "dirty" ;-) -- Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935 Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
