On 30 March 2011 01:45, Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@linaro.org> wrote:
> I don't think this is a correct interpretation of the license.  You don't
> have to change a package name to "plainly mark" the source as modified;
> debian/copyright, changelogs, notices in the source files accomplish this.
> This is done for packages all the time, not just for zlib.

from http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_license.html

2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
     misrepresented as being the original software.

I read this then as "you cannot distribute it as a replacement of the
original zlib library".
I'll take your word that it's not the case, but it still is confusing to me.

Konstantinos

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to