On 02/03/11 at 09:52pm, Michael Hope wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > On 2 March 2011 01:33, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MonthlyMilestones > > > >>> That would be an annoying format change for toolchain group > >>> releases, which are already on a monthly schedule and currently > >>> use "2011.03" for milestone names, and "2011.03-0" (-1, -2 ...) > >>> for release versions. > > > >> Hi Peter. We'll keep the 2011.xx-y names for the products. Each > >> project has product series and a planning series. The product series > >> are ones like '4.5' or '4.4' for gcc-linaro, and 'trunk' for > >> qemu-linaro, and these then have milestones like '2011.03'. > > > > Is this a proposal to vary the proposed new milestone names, > > or a suggestion that the toolchain group should continue as > > it is and not worry about the inconsistency with other groups? > > There's no change from our product series/milestone naming point of > view. The dates will change to the end of the month to sync up across > Linaro. There will be a parallel and, unfortunately, largely > identical planning series with milestones as well.
For status.linaro.org to correctly track your Blueprints and Work Items together with the rest of Linaro's outputs they must be targeted to a milestone named like in the wiki page. Status will group all projects together with the same milestone to get a picture of what is due for that date. Targeting Work Items or Blueprints to another milestone will mean they won't show up. > -- Michael Regards, Jamie. _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
