On 10 Aug 19, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:35:31PM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > * ACTION: Amit A to document details on power supply class (battery info) > > to PowerTOP internal wiki page > > Is there an internal wiki for PowerTOP, or is this an internal page on > the Linaro wiki?
This shouldn't have contained the word 'internal'. Everything is public at https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Powertop > > * ACTION: ARM to discuss giving out internal Eclipse based tool (similar > > to powertop) (no ETA as of now) > > Is this tool included or based on ARM's DS-5 kit? I'll let ARM talk about this. > > * Power management differentiation > > * Discussion with Robin from ARM about common frameworks > > * Robin not convinced about all the consolidation effort, since some > > of it is seen as competetive differentiator > > * Amit K believes Mechanism should be common amongst vendors so that > > can use common tools and design patterns. > > * Policies can be different to allow differentiation > > * e.g. have a cpufreq and cpuidle driver allows all vendors to > > use powertop tool. If current frameworks don't suit the needs, we can work > > with upstream to extend them. > > This is the correct approach; mechanism should be common and provided by > the upstream kernel. Policy should be implemented by vendors and > deployed in the way which makes most sense for their projects. Cheers, Amit _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
