On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:35:31PM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote: > * ACTION: Amit A to document details on power supply class (battery info) to > PowerTOP internal wiki page
Is there an internal wiki for PowerTOP, or is this an internal page on the Linaro wiki? > * ACTION: ARM to discuss giving out internal Eclipse based tool (similar to > powertop) (no ETA as of now) Is this tool included or based on ARM's DS-5 kit? > * Power management differentiation > * Discussion with Robin from ARM about common frameworks > * Robin not convinced about all the consolidation effort, since some of > it is seen as competetive differentiator > * Amit K believes Mechanism should be common amongst vendors so that > can use common tools and design patterns. > * Policies can be different to allow differentiation > * e.g. have a cpufreq and cpuidle driver allows all vendors to use > powertop tool. If current frameworks don't suit the needs, we can work with > upstream to extend them. This is the correct approach; mechanism should be common and provided by the upstream kernel. Policy should be implemented by vendors and deployed in the way which makes most sense for their projects. -- Christian Robottom Reis | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | http://launchpad.net/~kiko Linaro Engineering VP | [ +1] 612 216 4935 | http://async.com.br/~kiko _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
