Re: polyphony and bendAfter

[Phil Holmes]

http://lilypond.org/bug-reports.html

--
Phil Holmes


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gagi Petrovic 
  To: LilyPond Users 
  Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 2:58 PM
  Subject: Re: polyphony and bendAfter


  Hi all, 

  Could the ignoring of the  before mentioned bendAfter be a bug, or does it 
work as intended? 

  If it isn't, where can I do bug reports? 

  And in case it is, where can I propose enhancement requests? 

  Thanks! 
  Gagi

  On Jan 19, 2015 9:39 AM, "Gagi Petrovic" <gagig...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Dear LilyPond group,


    Does anyone know how to correctly implement a bendAfter with polyphony? 
When i do

      <e a,>\bendAfter #1 c c 


    LilyPond simply ignores the bendAfter.

    The following example works, but isn't a very efficient/elegant workaround. 
Besides, it's technically not correct either since the bend should depart from 
both notes.



     <<     
        {
          \hideNotes
          e2\bendAfter #2
        }
        \\
        { \unHideNotes 
          <e a,>2 c c c
        }      
     >>



    Any clue would be greatly appreciated :)


    Thanks in advance and all the best,

    Gagi



    full code:
    \version "2.18.2"

    \score {
      \new Staff { 
        \relative c' { \cadenzaOn 
        
     <<      
        {
          \hideNotes
          e2\bendAfter #2
        }
        \\
        { \unHideNotes 

          <e a,>2 c c c
        }      
     >>
      
      <e a,>\bendAfter #1 c c 
                
        }
      }
    }




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  lilypond-user mailing list
  lilypond-user@gnu.org
  https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user