Il giorno mer 24 dic 2014 alle 8:33, Johan Vromans
<jvrom...@squirrel.nl> ha scritto:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:13:41 -0500
Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3752
I agree 100% with David’s comment on that Google code page: it's
really
embarrassing that we don't have anything like that.
As far as I know, coda en segno are often (mostly?) used to break the
structure of a piece of music beyond the capabilities of repetition
loops.
In programming terms, it's kind of GOTO -- at an arbitrary location
you can
say 'jump there' and continue. That would be very hard to catch in
terms of
repetition loops. In most programming languages you can eliminate
GOTOs but
LilyPond is not a programming language.
I'd love to see some use cases of this hypothetical coda and fine
\repeats.
I had the same thought when I read the issue, but I thought it was just
me.. I'm quite ignorant in music notation..
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
