jeff235 wrote > On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:46:08 PM UTC+2, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > >> Or just communicating with the QuickTime synthesizer directly? > > Sure, whatever works. (I just thought the combination I mentioned sounded > better.)
+1, especially if MIDI playback that works "out-of-the-box" is just as easy (or easier?) to do than getting Frescobaldi to see the MIDI ports provided by SimpleSynth or FluidSynth (the current problem). jeff235 wrote >> That may not be a bad idea. But then how would you handle Lilypond >> upgrades? > > People could always install newer versions and add them in Preferences > > LilyPond Preferences. Frescobaldi already handles multiple versions of > LilyPond intelligently, which is helpful. Yes, and also wouldn't it work to just include a new stable release of LilyPond in a new release of Frescobaldi? At least for those who are using the stable releases. Or I just saw Urs' message with a different idea... At any rate this could be a future addition (in one way or another) after the initial "1.0" release of the mac app bundle. -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Mac-testers-needed-for-Frescobaldi-tp161735p162609.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
