Urs Liska wrote > Am 20.03.2014 00:18, schrieb Kieren MacMillan: >> Hi Urs, >> >>>> Time for a Lilypond Publishing House... >>> I'd say rather push LilyPond into the existing publishing houses. >> >> Why not both? > > Nothing against it. But actually there _are_ already a number of > "LilyPond Publishing Houses" - all of them of neglectable market impact. > >> >>> And I think changes have never been better for that than now. >> >> True. >> >> In my opinion, here — in order of importance — are the things we need to >> make established houses sit up and take notice: >> >> 1. Flawless MusicXML import and export. >> 2. Better “pixel-level” control of objects. >> 3. A finely-tuned stylesheet system. >> 4. Excellent, “turnkey" edition control features. >> 5. Several examples of fairly complex engravings, presented with “best >> practice” coding. >> >> #4 is nearly in place, thanks to Jan-Peter. > > Indeed. I hope it will be possible to make that generally usable (be it > through inclusion in LilyPond itself or a easily usable place in one of > the libraries. > Having this would be a valuable additional selling point. > >> >> #3 would take, in my estimation, about 10 person-hours to prepare an >> exemplar set of stylesheets (I’d be happy to do this myself), and 5-10 >> hours to create an appropriate stylesheet-loading function. >> > > I'm not so sure if this would really matter that much in terms of > "market penetration". > Which isn't to say that I'd find that highly desirable myself. > >> #5 could be put together in “no time”. > > At the messe I had a compilation of samples (explicitly including > non-publication quality "default" engravings) with me (including your > Beethoven BTW), and this proved very useful. > >> >> #2 would require some fundamental changes to Lilypond — likely this is >> the largest hurdle. > > Apart from pixel-level it will be a tremenduous step if we manage to get > a certain kind of graphical approach to that, as is currently being > worked on in Frescobaldi. > Graphically editing things while retaining strict control over the > source code will be a killer feature. > So I'd add that as a separate item to your list. > >> >> #1 is the next largest hurdle. > > Yes, and a crucial one. But I think current development is very > promising. For the first time someone is actually working on it. > Although it is only a first step this is really a solid foundation. > (Although only visible when using Frescobaldi from its Git repository. > >> >> Thoughts? > > One thing that isn't in your list - and which already is there - is > everything around the power of version controlled workflows. This > provides solutions to actual problems people have. At least this was my > experience in Frankfurt. Everybody seems to know about the hassles one > has with concurrent revisions of files when having to pass documents > around. Meticulous project documentation, encapsulation in branches etc. > were keywords editors could grasp immediately. > Question is how they will react when they see actual LilyPond code. I'm > looking forward to that (there are two publishers I'll visit for closer > demonstrations, with two more I have hopes to get to that point too). > > Urs > >> >> Kieren. >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >>
> lilypond-user@ >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Are there any style sheets floating around that people can take a look at? The sheet Urs & co. used looked great to my eyes, on that collection. Maybe that could help users and also inspire them to create their own sorts of "house styles". Just a thought... ----- composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/short-Musikmesse-minutes-tp160594p160628.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user