Shouldn't this be the default output? Looking at hand-engraved examples, such as this lied<http://javanese.imslp.info/files/imglnks/usimg/1/18/IMSLP16170-SchubertD489_Der_Wanderer_1st_version_called_Der_Ungluckliche.pdf>, words tend to be centered ignoring punctuation (measures 8 and 14), or further right than they would be if centered (measure 10). Currently the default seems to be the reverse.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I just recognized that this snippet does not work as-is in 2.18.0 (and > 2.17.x for x large enough), but gives -inf.0 as X-offsets if no punctuation > prefixes a syllable. IIUC empty text-markups now return empty instead of > point stencils these days, and the width computation for the punctuation > prefixes barfs out. Maybe a side effect from the refined skyline > computation? > Anyway, attached is a modified version which works on 2.17.x and 2.18. > Could you update the LSR snippet? I'm not allowed to. Thanks! > > > Best, > Alexander > > > On 09/30/2013 10:29 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > >> 2013/9/30 Phil Holmes <em...@philholmes.net>: >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Morley" >>> <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>>>> I agree, although I don't expect Guile problems for anything but plain >>>>> > >>>>> ASCII >>>>> prime and double prime, but I might be wrong. >>>>> It's easy to tweak for people who want to use it, anyway; those were > >>>>> just >>>>> the glyphs for which I assume that everybody agrees they should be in > >>>>> there. >>>>> YMMV, though. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well, I could add a comment about how to extend the 'space-set' with >>>> other characters. >>>> Additionally it might be a thought to tag it docs. >>>> @Phil: What do you think? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Harm >>>> >>> >>> >>> Not sure what you're asking my opinion about. >>> >> >> Sorry not been clear enough. >> >> As to whether to tag is as docs? If we do that, it will automatically >>> appear in the Snippets documentation >>> (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/snippets/index.html). It >>> will >>> become available for documentation authors to add to other documents. So >>> the judgement call is simply - do I think this is of sufficient use to be >>> part of the LilyPond documentation set. If so, tag it. >>> >>> -- >>> Phil Holmes >>> >> >> If I understand correctly, it's up to _me_ to decide whether I should >> tag it doc or not. >> >> So I'll add some more description/comments and do the doc-tag. >> >> Thanks, >> Harm >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
