----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Burfitt" <phil.burf...@talktalk.net>
To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net>; "Carl Peterson"
<carlopeter...@gmail.com>; "James Harkins" <jamshar...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mailinglist lilypond-user" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond Website Work (was: A thought on Windows Experience)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 3:35 PM
Our server is provided on a goodwill basis, and so we would not want to
use any scripting that might load it.
Carl Perterson wrote:
CSS gradients can be coded for fewer bytes and one less server request,
with graceful degradation if CSS3 is not available on a browser.
TBH, this is a complete waste of time. The image files are minuscule and
affect loading time zilch.
For every image link in an html page, a browser makes another http request
to get that image! You said you want to save server load?
Phil.
Well, yes, as CPU load. I remain of the view that this is not a good use of
time - there are other things that will be of greater value for less effort.
Remember, you'll not be doing this by editing HTML, but the texi2HTML
control files.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
