2013/11/19 Keith E OHara <k-oh...@oco.net>: > On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 02:15:54 -0800, Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> And btw, i think that it would be good if we had separate >> stretchability and compressability properties. For example, when i >> have a SATB choral piece and vertical spacing is cramped, the >> distances between staves should be compressed more than the distances >> between systems (because it's very important that the systems remain >> visually separate). However, when there is a lot of vertical space, >> it's the distances between systems that should stretch more than >> distances between staves (as we don't want to have "airy" systems). >> So, system-system distances should have high stretchability but low >> compressability compared to staff-staff distances. > > > LilyPond does have separate stretchability and compressibility. Between > lines and systems on the page, compressibility is the difference between > basic-distance and minimum-distance.
Fascinating! I'm using Lilypond for a long time and she still surprises me ;-) Thanks for explanation. best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
