Bric <b...@flight.us> writes: > Although, I must say: it's an awful choice of markup words, given the > semantics at play: > > "\transpose" to change written pitch
Not just written pitch. Everything. > and > > "\transposition" to change the audible, midi pitch No, to specify the transposition of an instrument. That's nothing that you can change. > because they are noun- and verb-form variants of the same word, and > the noun versus verb distinction somehow aligns with the audio versus > visual distinction ... doesn't seem congruent or intiutive > > (I did find the "transpose" command earlier, and realized it wasn't > changing the pitch — only the written.) It changes the audible pitch _along_ with the written pitch. At least if we are talking 2.17.13 or later (cf issue 754 in the tracker <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=754>). The behavior before that was plain nuts. There were usage patterns based on this behavior, but nobody really understood why they worked, and when and how they broke down. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user