SCORE was amazing and practically limitless. Back in the DOS days. Now, with "newer" versions of the program? I'd only use it if I was forced.
YMMV Tim Reeves-3 wrote >> Message: 9 >> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT) >> From: SoundsFromSound < > soundsfromsound@ > > >> To: > lilypond-user@ >> Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software >> Message-ID: < > 1375950947119-148848.post@.nabble >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the >> LilyPond mentions. >> As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going >> back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison. >> Period. >> With LilyPond, you're only limited by your imagination. >> > > That's funny. I always thought the one defining positive attribute of > SCORE was that you *could do anything* imaginable (music notation-wise) > with it. The drawback is that you *have to do everything* manually, one > note at a time...requires a lot more thinking, deciding. > Whereas Lilypond has the best of both worlds - very good results > automatically, plus all the flexibility to do crazy stuff. > > Tim Reeves > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ----- composer | sound designer -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Steinberg-s-progress-report-on-new-notation-software-tp148842p148901.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
