> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
> From: SoundsFromSound <soundsfromso...@gmail.com>
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
> Message-ID: <1375950947119-148848.p...@n5.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
> LilyPond mentions.
> As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going
> back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison.
> Period.
> With LilyPond, you're only limited by your imagination.
>
That's funny. I always thought the one defining positive attribute of
SCORE was that you *could do anything* imaginable (music notation-wise)
with it. The drawback is that you *have to do everything* manually, one
note at a time...requires a lot more thinking, deciding.
Whereas Lilypond has the best of both worlds - very good results
automatically, plus all the flexibility to do crazy stuff.
Tim Reeves
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
