David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes: > > FWIW, I started out by using emacs to edit my Lilypond files, but > > found problems. Auto-indentation was hit or miss, and the > > auto-completion dictionary has some major gaps. > > Uh, it is generated from LilyPond's own source files, so you should > probably install a version from your LilyPond source tree and/or > distribution.
OK, not sure how my installation was missing so much, then. Frescobaldi's user experience is so much better (for me) at least that, as much as I like emacs, it's not worth losing Frescobaldi's better features. > At any rate, I already stated that the real value Emacs provides is the > ecosystem coming with it. LilyPond-mode alone is no game-changer. One reason is sufficient for me to keep using emacs: org-mode. That one *is* a game changer :) hjh _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
