2013/4/5 Alex Voice <alvo...@btinternet.com>:
> Hi Lilypond Experts,
>
> In a piece of music I am currently engraving, the composer requests a
> combination of dashed slur on the harmonic but solid tie on the base note,
> and in the following it works perfectly in example A, but in B (where the
> harmonic remains on the note d) one gets an extra solid tie. I have tried
> various ways around this (see B' and B'') but neither are quite satisfactory
> – in B' the phrasing slur is no substitute for a tie, and in B'' the stems
> do not quite align convincingly.
>
>
> \version "2.16.2"
> \relative c'
> {
> \time 3/4
> \set doubleSlurs = ##f
> <<
> { \slurDashed
> d2.\harmonic^\markup "A" ^( | c2.\harmonic) }
> { g2.~ | g2. }
>>>
> % --------------
> <<
> { \slurDashed
> d'2.\harmonic^\markup "B" ^( | d2.\harmonic) }
> { g,2.~ | g2. }
>>>
> % --------------
> <<
> { \slurDashed
> d'2.\harmonic^\markup "B'" ^( | d2.\harmonic ) }
> { g,2._\( | g2.\) }
>>>
> % --------------
> <<
> { \slurDashed
> d'2.\harmonic^\markup "B''" ^( | d2.\harmonic) }
> \\
> {
> \stemUp
> g,2._~ | g2.
> }
>>>
> }
>
>
> Am I missing something really obvious here!? Is there any way of losing the
> superfluous tie in B?
>
> Many thanks for whatever advice or solutions you may suggest.
>
> Alex Voice
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
Hi,
does the code below what you want?
\version "2.16.2"
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\time 3/4
<<
{
\slurDashed
d2.\harmonic^\markup "A" ^( |
c2.\harmonic)
}
{
g2.~ | g2.
}
>>
% --------------
<<
{
\phrasingSlurDashed
d'2.\harmonic^\markup "B"^\( |
d2.\harmonic\)
}
{ \slurSolid g,2.( | g2.) }
>>
}
-Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
