On Sat, 9 Mar 2013, Paul Scott wrote:
On 03/09/2013 06:26 AM, James Harkins wrote:
I don't really have a good idea how some kind of voting process would
look like where we get relevant feedback from a substantial number of
non-specialists.
FWIW, speaking as a Lilypond user with some programming experience (but who
is not a LP developer) -- I was skeptical of the change at first, but I'm
wholly convinced by David's point that \relative d'' { d e f } features a
redundant d that could be removed from the syntax by \relative { d'' e f }.
The fact that it's a new rule doesn't make it a bad rule. I think I would
adapt to this syntax easily.
+1
When this thread started I was having some doubts. But after reading the
comments I am beginning to like the idea:
+1
--
MT
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
