Sorry -- here is *working* code to reproduce the situation:
\relative c'' {
\stemDown
\times 4/5{c8[( \f a' \times 2/3{c8 \grace {a32 [ c b \p ]} a8
\afterGrace c {a32 [ c b ]}}}
\stopStaff \startStaff
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'( 18 16 14 12 10 4 2 0
-2 -4 )
\override Stem #'no-stem-extend = ##t
\times 4/5{a' c a cis
\stopStaff \startStaff
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'( 4 2 0 -2 -4 )
\override Stem #'no-stem-extend = ##f
a,,} c
\stopStaff \startStaff
\override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'( -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 )
\override Stem #'no-stem-extend = ##f
\time 3/8
a,, c a c])
}
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jeffrey Trevino <jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've got a rogue tuplet bracket trying to span notes on the note side
> instead of the beam side, and I'd like to specify that the tuplet bracket
> should always be on the beam side. Internals tell me that I need to set
> ly:tuplet-bracket::calc-direction
> equal to -1, but I'm not sure what the syntax for that would look like.
>
> Here's code to reproduce the situation:
>
> \relative c'' {
> staff.override.tuplet_bracket = ly:tuplet-bracket::calc-direction = -1
> \stemDown
> \times 4/5{c8[( \f a' \times 2/3{c8 \grace {a32 [ c b \p ]} a8
> \afterGrace c {a32 [ c b ]}}}
> \stopStaff \startStaff
> \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'( 18 16 14 12 10 4 2 0
> -2 -4 )
> \override Stem #'no-stem-extend = ##t
> \times 4/5{a' c a cis
> \stopStaff \startStaff
> \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'( 4 2 0 -2 -4 )
> \override Stem #'no-stem-extend = ##f
> a,,} c
> \stopStaff \startStaff
> \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'( -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 )
> \override Stem #'no-stem-extend = ##f
> \time 3/8
> a,, c a c])
> }
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
