Am 09.01.2013 20:07, schrieb David Kastrup:
At least with regard to chord names, the current situation is untenable.
That does not necessarily mean that a new font needs to be developed.
But one way or the other, the default look of LilyPond needs to be more
consistent and less ugly.
If one wants to replace the chord names font, what else would one have
to take into account?
Are the chord names typeset using the default sans serif font? And what
else would be printed with that font?
(Sorry for my ignorance, but I never used chord symbols so far. But from
the examples I have seen so far, I'd second that there is quite some
potential for improvement here ...
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
