David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes:

> Federico Bruni <fedel...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I used to display the Arpeggio in TabStaff this way:
>> \revert Arpeggio #'stencil
>>
>> I know that David made a big change in the code and the synthax is
>> changed, but I can't make it work.
>>
>> \revert Arpeggio.stencil
>>
>> doesn't work.
>> What's wrong?
>
> So far, looks like a bug to me.  Writing
>
>       { \revert TabStaff.Arpeggio.stencil }
>
> instead (including braces) does have the desired effect.  Now the
> question is how a bug of that calibre (reverts in context definitions
> don't work) was able to make it through the regtests.
>
> No idea.  I am on it.

<URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3009>

and it is totally baffling that this did not actually trigger any
regtest.  It would appear that \revert did no longer work in context
modifications at all.

Wow.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to