On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2012/11/5 Olivier Biot <olivier.b...@gmail.com>: >> Dear all, >> >> I think I just found a Lilypond bug. >> >> The following snippet with fingerings does only show one "open string" >> fingering while TWO have been written. The order of _ and ^ play no >> role in this bug. >> >> Expected behavior: both "\open" fingerings are displayed, one above >> and one below selected note.
[ ...] > Hi Olivier, > > I'm not sure that it is a bug. > > script-init.ly shows: > open = #(make-articulation "open") > > So \open is an articulation (not a fingering). > I think a note can be articulated only once in the same manner, so I'd > _expect_ that one setting is skipped. > > BTW, \open is printed different compared to fingerings. I'd prefer to use > d8_0^0 Thank you for this input Thomas. For a cellist I see no distinction between using "finger 0" and using an open string (\open). Technically the "\open" macro is an articulation, but I do not know if it should be seen as an articulation rather than as a fingering. Same with "\flageolet" and "\thumb"... Right now I replaced "\open" with "0" in that score snippet so I could render both fingerings on the score. This of course raises the question whether there should be a specific subset of articulations that should behave more like fingerings (I'm thinking \open, \flageolet and \thumb here). Unless I'm completely wrong. > P.S. > If you think you've detected a bug, you should send it to the bug-list: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/web/bug-reports.html > On the user-list it might get lost. Thank you for pointing me to the bug list! Best regards, Olivier _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
